| Author |
Message |
xardoz Ashigaru
Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 108 Location: Napavine, WA USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The crew I hang with visits Programmers corner, VbExplorer and VBCity.
Last edited by xardoz on Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:14 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shaldares Grasshopper
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 19 Location: Everywhere in the Salt Lake Valley, Utah
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One thing I just noticed.... | Newsletter Archives wrote: | | In today's issue: October 18th, 2004 | that is the most recent newsletter.... no newsletters, no news section on the front page, that in and of itself makes the site seem old and outdated...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eric Idea Hamster
Joined: 21 Oct 2004 Posts: 679 Location: Bangor, Maine
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The newsletters were stopped due to lack of content.
So you can see... the whole "lack of regular content" has been going on for quite awhile.
I don't know if anyone can pull a list of all content added since October 2004... but it would be interesting to see... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kroc Grasshopper
Joined: 22 Mar 2005 Posts: 2 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hrqls? Goodness, that name brings back memories.
The site could do with an overhaul and refocusing.
There's one thing I need from a coders site, and that's quick access to concise, meaningful examples. PC's examples are good, but the page design is terrible. A lightweight CMS/Wiki would do well, with tagging
RSS > Newsletter. Get with the times. It's web2.0 already
I'd like to add I've got a crap load of fully commented VB6 code to contribute and could probably write a number of articles. See hxxp://code.google.cooom/p/pacmar (edit as appropriate, your antispam is very tough) and either check out the code with SVN, or message me for a copy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eric Idea Hamster
Joined: 21 Oct 2004 Posts: 679 Location: Bangor, Maine
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So, anyone heard anything from Adam yet about turning over the site?
I think Kroc has a good idea. Time to move up to the "Web 2.0" bandwagon. Get a good CMS (wordpress, textpattern, DotNetNuke, etc) and work from there. Any good CMS supports RSS feeds.
I don't necessarily agree that RSS > Newsletter. They each have their own purpose. But for this site, RSS is definitely needed, and a newsletter isn't right now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
theraje Cap'n Arr!
Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 262
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Eric wrote: | | So, anyone heard anything from Adam yet about turning over the site? |
I haven't. I've been working on an outline for the new site though, regardless. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kroc Grasshopper
Joined: 22 Mar 2005 Posts: 2 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| theraje wrote: | | I haven't. I've been working on an outline for the new site though, regardless. |
I'd like to hear about your ideas. What we need is a thinking-pot for all of us to discuss, plot and design what we would intend for P-C. I've created a page on GPWiki to allow use to freely mind-dump and organise the good ideas.
Please direct your ideas toward this wiki page, thanks:
gpwiki.org/index.php/New_Programmers-Corner_Plan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bdi Nobody
Joined: 21 Oct 2004 Posts: 1646 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't get it guys...
| Quote: | | So, anyone heard anything from Adam yet about turning over the site? |
Yeah, I have, and as any sane person might think, he is completely offended by the conversation and the approach to this, and he will probably never post in this thread.
First, he was offended because this was not brought to him first. Then he was offended as people continued to refer to the site as though it's a democracy. It is not a democracy, it is a site with a sole owner.
If you're not happy with the site, then start a new one. Why is everyone so insistent that Adam has to give this one away? There's all this stuff about "all the content". All you need to do is get the permission of the author to use it. And, if you're going to say that anyway, then you might want to consider whether or not you are going to create content on a regular basis anyway,or if you would be making some quick changes and then leaving P-C in the same state it is now.
Now, if I look at the basic suggestions for "upgrades" all I see is more of the same. A CMS? A wiki? RSS? It sounds like "just another programming site" to me. How does that change P-C into "something new"?
Rather than looking to change something owned by someone else, why not work on creating your own? Kroc has a good idea in having a page somewhere to discuss it, just get rid of the "New P-C" name. Clint is on the right path by working on a business plan outline for a site. A CMS, wiki, and RSS are good basic ideas to help start your site. Now go out and find something that will set it apart from all the rest. Make it better than the others. If it's good, the people will come. If you need content, go out and hunt down some authors to get their permission, and start writing your own (because in the end, that's the only content you can count on).
You're not going to change P-C by attacking the owner and demanding he hand the site over, but if you really want something different, there is nothing stopping you from building your own. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xardoz Ashigaru
Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 108 Location: Napavine, WA USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am sure that no one meant any malice toward Adam.
People just get caught up in the moment.
It is sad to see a board going quite, it is like the local bar for us programmers.
And as programmers, we want to help fix/make better things we are involved in...
I apologize if any of my statements offended Adam in any way.
PS.. and you too BDI  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kroc Grasshopper
Joined: 22 Mar 2005 Posts: 2 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Web2 is all about doing the exact same thing you've always been doing, just on the web, with hype, buzzwords and big gaudy logos. GMail? Outlook Exchange 0nline ~ 1999. It's all been done before, now just with the right gloss / marketing.
RefactorMyCode have managed to condense something as complex and nightmarish as a heavy forum full the brim with buttons, widgets, modes and topics into a simple list of to-the-point question and answers.
If Programmer's corner wants to do something "new", it should adopt the refactormycode approach, but instead be offering concise programming examples (such as it already is), with comments from viewers.
The "forum" would be the same, but just a separate tag "questions" that allowed someone to post a question, and get answers in a similar lightweight way.
The examples can then use a folskonomy system for categories / languages &c.
Real innovation, that affects a lot of people, is about doing something that already exists, better. Apple's Time Machine is an example of how backup should have been from the very beginning. Only 4% of people ever back up, proof that the old system sucks, bad.
If Adam's offended, he should close the thread and be done with it. If he's interested in suggestions for improvement, then he needs to be here to direct things from the fanciful, toward the possible. And if he wants no part of this, then the discussion should move on to setting up a new site. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
theraje Cap'n Arr!
Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 262
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been holding off posting to this thread for days... but I guess there's not much point in it.
| bdi wrote: | | Quote: | | So, anyone heard anything from Adam yet about turning over the site? |
Yeah, I have, and as any sane person might think, he is completely offended by the conversation and the approach to this, and he will probably never post in this thread.
First, he was offended because this was not brought to him first. Then he was offended as people continued to refer to the site as though it's a democracy. It is not a democracy, it is a site with a sole owner. |
Adam got offended? Adam has no right to be offended.
On the point that he's offended that we didn't come to him first... he's either deaf, dumb, and blind to not know the state of P-C, or he's just playing the victim because he thinks we're a bunch of retards and that he can get away with it. He knows fully well that P-C is all but dead, with only a few "regulars" who post every once in a blue moon. I'd bet there are at least a couple of people here who are offended at Adam's lack of... well, to be honest, he hasn't done a damn thing since P-C was turned over to him.
Long story short, Adam never gave a damn about Programmer's Corner, so why is he pretending to be offended? Because of someone pointing out the obvious?
On the point that the site is not a democracy, it's true that Adam can do whatever he wants with P-C. It's up to him whether or not to do anything about what anyone else says. But hell, what's wrong with wanting to save the site? Adam won't lift a finger to do anything, so what's the big stink about someone who gives a crap about P-C taking over to attempt to revive the place?
| bdi wrote: | | If you're not happy with the site, then start a new one. Why is everyone so insistent that Adam has to give this one away? |
Because we don't want P-C to die. Adam is slowly but surely killing it. 2+2=?
It is evident that we will have to start a new site as long as Adam wants to play the victim card and hide behind his desk.
| bdi wrote: | | You're not going to change P-C by attacking the owner and demanding he hand the site over, but if you really want something different, there is nothing stopping you from building your own. |
Unfortunately, nothing is going to change P-C as long as Adam controls it. Don't be upset because we don't want the site to be dead space on the Web.
| Kroc wrote: | | If Adam's offended, he should close the thread and be done with it. If he's interested in suggestions for improvement, then he needs to be here to direct things from the fanciful, toward the possible. And if he wants no part of this, then the discussion should move on to setting up a new site. |
Couldn't have said it better myself. If Adam wants P-C to die, then we should help him by stealing his traffic. </rant> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aschenta *narf*
Joined: 07 May 2003 Posts: 548 Location: Windsor Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm offended by the fact that all of you are blaming me. P-C is a collaborative effort and was failing before it was handed to me. Early on when I took over I attempted to do things but got no response from any you. Lack of motivation on all of your ends resulted in lack of motivation on my end.
The biggest offense is that someone wanted to take over the site and went to all of you instead of directly asking me. To have members who have long abandoned P-C come back and start ranting about how it is all my fault is pathetic. I'd like to see all of you start a new site because I know it would fail. No one attempted to put any effort into P-C for the past 3 years not just me.
To say I never cared about P-C is rather ridiculous. I wrote the damn thing! I even started a simple programming contest that received NO submissions. The newsletter failed because Eric didn't have the time to do it. Of course that didn't matter as there wasn't any content to have a need for a newsletter.
P-C for me has always been about learning. I first started doing the development to learn PHP. Since then my desire to program in PHP has dropped to zero. I am in the process of converting the site to ASP.NET 3.5 with VB9 (Visual Studio 2008) and SQL Server 2005. Is there any interest in helping that along? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xardoz Ashigaru
Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 108 Location: Napavine, WA USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I dont know much about ASP.NET 3.5 with VB9 (Visual Studio 2008) and SQL Server 2005, but I would love to help where I can. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
theraje Cap'n Arr!
Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 262
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| *narf* wrote: | | I'm offended by the fact that all of you are blaming me. P-C is a collaborative effort and was failing before it was handed to me. Early on when I took over I attempted to do things but got no response from any you. Lack of motivation on all of your ends resulted in lack of motivation on my end. |
So which is it... are you offended that we didn't contribute to the collaborative effort, or are you offended that we thought this was a collaborative effort?
So I guess P-C failed because we didn't bow to your will. My apologies, your highness. But seriously, the only thing I remember you attempting to do something for P-C was to convert the code to ASP or somesuch. That never happened. Who wants to do anything for a site where the owner won't do anything for it?
| *narf* wrote: | | The biggest offense is that someone wanted to take over the site and went to all of you instead of directly asking me. |
The only reason you're offended is that you're just embarrassed that someone finally had the balls to come out and directly attempt to improve upon your shortcomings. You never made any attempt to listen to what the folks of P-C have had to say. It's all about you, you, you.
| *narf* wrote: | | To have members who have long abandoned P-C come back and start ranting about how it is all my fault is pathetic. I'd like to see all of you start a new site because I know it would fail. |
Ah, so now it comes out. It's good to know where we stand with you.
| *narf* wrote: | | No one attempted to put any effort into P-C for the past 3 years not just me. |
So we're all at fault - there's no arguing that. The only problem I personally have with all this is the fact that you'd rather have P-C be an eyesore on the side of the Internet than give it to someone who will at least *try* to do something with it.
| *narf* wrote: | | To say I never cared about P-C is rather ridiculous. I wrote the damn thing! I even started a simple programming contest that received NO submissions. The newsletter failed because Eric didn't have the time to do it. Of course that didn't matter as there wasn't any content to have a need for a newsletter. |
Ok, you got me there. I shouldn't have said never. It would have been more accurate to say that "you almost always didn't give a damn about P-C." There were *plenty* of suggestions on fixing the site and/or forums, but *none* of them were done. You never did anything to get more visitors (apart from us, but we're the reason P-C failed in the first place, right?). You never did anything. You may have written P-C, but it doesn't take much of a parent to birth a baby and leave it in a dumpster.
| *narf* wrote: | | P-C for me has always been about learning. I first started doing the development to learn PHP. Since then my desire to program in PHP has dropped to zero. I am in the process of converting the site to ASP.NET 3.5 with VB9 (Visual Studio 2008) and SQL Server 2005. Is there any interest in helping that along? |
You mean like when you were in the process of converting the site to ASP a couple years ago? The process that was never done? I'll believe it when I see it. And even then, I'd love to see how changing the scripting language will make P-C live again.
Before I go: You may wish failure upon us, but at least it won't because we didn't try to succeed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shaldares Grasshopper
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 19 Location: Everywhere in the Salt Lake Valley, Utah
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, we're all at fault. There's no debating that. I abandoned PC multiple times, whether it was my fault or not. I'm not denying that, but I never did say it was simply Adam's fault, and I don't think until near the end of this thread any of us really did. However, it doesn't matter who's at fault because we all are. What matters is that we have enough people here who want to do something about it now, so let's stop bitching about who's fault it is, and we need to figure out some way to do something about it. I wish I could offer more of a suggestion than that, but as I've stated in the past, my programming experience is limited. One thing that does remain though, is that Adam, while everything may not be directly your fault, if the site is going to go anywhere, we need a way to make changes to it, as well as someone who is going to be active enough to do it. Are you going to try to implement our suggestions or provide outlets so that we can implement our suggestions, because right now I'm pretty sure a lot of us are feeling at a dead end. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
theraje Cap'n Arr!
Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 262
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Shaldares wrote: | | One thing that does remain though, is that Adam, while everything may not be directly your fault, if the site is going to go anywhere, we need a way to make changes to it, as well as someone who is going to be active enough to do it. |
Yeah... that's what I was (less eloquently) trying to say. Maybe I could use anger management counseling... or maybe just let Shaldares be my spokesman.
| Shaldares wrote: | | Are you going to try to implement our suggestions or provide outlets so that we can implement our suggestions, because right now I'm pretty sure a lot of us are feeling at a dead end. |
That's where the frustration comes from. It looks like P-C is just going to sit here in cryogenic slumber for the rest of its existence, and that's depressing.
But I don't know. Shaldares doesn't have content, I don't have content (at least with the site in this form), and I don't know who else might. It could be that we need to reach out to find some developers willing to contribute periodically... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hrqls De Blonde Puffin
Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 562 Location: Alkmaar, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
i always blamed myself (partially) for the quietness of PC
i dont think Adam has anything to do with it .. in fact he is the most active user on here (or was at certain times)
what PC does need most is people who ask their questions on here .. once there are questions the regulars will come back to answer them (and have fun puzzling some things out )
so what should be done is anything which would draw question-askers to PC
personally i am a bit stuck in VB6 .. i am doing some things in C# ... but i hardly have time to investigate C# as i did with VB6 .. also because i dont have a board like VBE which provided me with simple examples and questions from other newbie explorers which i could answer or learn from while puzzling them out
i have no answers though .. so you can blame me
i have little time lately .. so you can blame the world for disturbing me
*hug* to you all ... and i hope someone with more (commercial?) knowledge than me will have some ideas on how to draw (the right) traffic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WannaBe Wiggles
Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 714 Location: CA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry for my quietness, I went on vacation, was sick after words, and just staring into black space. So I got a lot of catching up to do.
Bdi noted that Adam was offended due to the fact I did not first go by him. And as went on about how people were voting, not a democracy.
Adam, I'm sorry that I didn't come to you first but I thought things out, different routes and what I thought would best get a response from you. Directly contacting you through e-mail or instant message would have clearly shown what I was asking from you, but then again I was only one person. I rather have others show their opinions as well, to maybe show even a blind's eye that things need to happen.
I also know this is no "democracy", why I didn't create a poll. What I think of this is protesting, people can protest on the internet can't they?
I understand making another site is a choice, though PC holds quite a bit of content, but it is also the name. People know PC, it holds rank on other sites that have it linked. Beside the fact starting a new site makes PC become competition which I don't know why, I just rather not do.
Not to shave, but you finally post Adam, and the only reason is someone got pissed. Yes the blame game, it is easy to start and never really finishes, while PC may not have been in any good condition when it was handed down, I have not seen much of any actions taken. The "Advisory Committee" forum was started, showed a lot of things that could be done. I even worked on a little bit of code. nothing happened, we could not do anything. Extending features required code access. Hard to work extending a back-end if you don't know what back-end even looks like.
If you read my post, and a few more down that taking over the site was not the first option, but I will say It was my rather preferred choice.
As you might know I don't know ASP.NET, but it is all about a learning experience right? So, I can always try. Give me a simple task, I'll see what I can do. Thats my offerings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|